LOS ANGELES— The Walt Disney Co. on Wednesday filed a claim against a Hong Kong precious jewelry business it implicates of marketing unlawful Mickey Computer mouse precious jewelry.
The global media and home entertainment corporation submitted a claim in government court in Los Angeles versus the Red Planet Team, which markets precious jewelry online under the name Satéur.
Disney claims the rings, pendants and jewelry in Satéur’s “Mickey 1928 Collection” breach its hallmark civil liberties which the Hong Kong business is intentionally attempting to mislead consumers right into assuming the items are main Disney product.
Satéur, the match declares, “means to existing Mickey Computer mouse as its very own brand name identifier for its precious jewelry product and “looks for to trade on the recognizability of the Mickey Computer mouse hallmarks and customers’ fondness for Disney and its legendary ambassador Mickey Computer mouse.”
A message looking for remark from reps of the Red Planet Team was not quickly addressed.
The legal action is a measure of Disney’s relentless initiatives to secure its copyright from unapproved appropriation. Although the earliest variation of Mickey Computer mouse got in the general public domain name in 2015 after Disney’s copyright ended, the business still holds hallmark civil liberties to the personality.
Lawyers for Disney suggest in the match that Red Planet’s internet marketing initiatives “thoroughly trade on the Mickey Computer mouse hallmarks and the Disney brand name” with language that consists of defining the precious jewelry as terrific for “Disney fanatics.”
Such techniques show Red Planet was “purposefully attempting to puzzle customers,” the legal action claims. The impact developed, it claims, “recommends, at a minimum, a collaboration or partnership with Disney.”
The earliest representation of Mickey Computer mouse, that initially showed up openly in the movie brief “Boat Willie” in 1928, are currently in the united state public domain name. The extensively promoted minute was thought about a site in iconography going public.
The legal action declares that Red Planet and Satéur are attempting to make use of that standing as a “ploy” to recommend the precious jewelry is lawful, by calling it the “Mickey 1928 Collection” and claiming it is being offered in homage to the computer mouse’s opening night.
The focal point of the collection, the match claims, is an item of precious jewelry marketed as the “Satéur Mickey 1928 Classique Ring,” which has a Boat Willie appeal resting on the band holding an artificial rock.
But there is an important distinction in between copyright– which secures artworks– and hallmark– which secures a business’s brand name.
Even if a personality remains in the general public domain name, it can not be utilized on product in such a way that recommends it is from the business with the hallmark, as Disney declares Red Planet is doing.
” Disney continues to be fully commited to defending against illegal hallmark violation and safeguarding customers from complication brought on by unapproved uses Mickey Computer mouse and our various other legendary personalities,” Disney claimed in a declaration Wednesday.
The legal action looks for an order versus Red Planet marketing the precious jewelry or trading on Disney’s hallmark in differently, in addition to financial problems to be figured out later on.
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All civil liberties booked. This product might not be released, program, revised or rearranged without authorization.
