NEW YORK— A court will certainly start considerations on Monday over the destiny of Sean “Diddy” Combs after listening to hugely varying sights from district attorneys and a defense attorney over whether he participated in sex trafficking for twenty years.
2 district attorneys firmly insisted that he had actually persuaded, endangered and often viciously required 2 ex-girlfriends to make love with male sex employees to please his sex-related satisfaction. They pointed out numerous acts of physical violence he accomplished versus them as evidence that they had no state.
A defense attorney after that buffooned the federal government’s closing debate and alerted that district attorneys were using an unique strategy to sex criminal activities that ran the risk of transforming the swinger way of life that Combs and his partners taken pleasure in right into possible criminal activities for all Americans.
Combs, 55, the creator of Bad Kid Enjoyment, has actually begged innocent to sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy theory costs in the test, which proceeds Monday when the court will certainly check out directions on the legislation to jurors prior to they start considerations.
Below are vital minutes from shutting debate on Thursday and Friday:
District attorneys revealed they weren’t taking out cases versus Combs
Prosecutors set off headings recently that they had actually withdrawed or removed cases of arson and kidnapping versus Combs when they claimed they were eliminating directions on the legislation concerning them to be provided jurors on Monday in reaction to the court’s demand to enhance the situation for the court.
” The Federal government is no more intending to continue on these concepts of responsibility so directions are no more needed,” district attorneys created in a letter to the court.
Yet when Aide United State Lawyer Christy Slavik introduced closings on Thursday, she offered the accusations of arson and kidnapping a starring duty in her very first sentences, calling them prior to any kind of others.
” Over the last numerous weeks, you have actually found out a great deal concerning Sean Combs. He’s the leader of a criminal venture. He does not take no for a solution. And currently you understand about numerous criminal activities the offender devoted with participants of his venture: Kidnapping of among the offender’s staff members; arson by attempting to explode a vehicle; required labor, including of a worker the offender repetitively sexually attacked; bribery of a gatekeeper to maintain darning proof versus the offender hidden; and certainly, the ruthless criminal activities at the heart of this situation– sex trafficking,” she claimed.
The arson insurance claim originated from proof that Slavik claimed revealed Combs lagged the firebombing of rap artist Child Cudi’s Porsche in 2012. The kidnapping claims additionally pertaining to Cudi. Slavik claimed Combs abducted a worker to join him when he burglarized Cudi’s home after finding out the rap artist was dating his sweetheart.
A defense attorney strikes back, putting down federal government’s case
Attorney Marc Agnifilo in an at-times rustic discussion saved couple of theatrics in buffooning the federal government’s situation versus Combs as overreach, stating numerous representatives put right into Combs’ homes in Miami and Los Angeles to take numerous containers of child oil and Astroglide lubricating substance.
” I presume it’s all worth it since they discovered the Astroglide. They discovered it in boxes, boxes of Astroglide removed the roads. Whew, I really feel far better currently,” he claimed, prior to including: “The roads of America are risk-free from the Astroglide!”
From the begin, Agnifilo attempted to depict district attorneys as unjustly targeting Combs after a previous sweetheart of almost 11 years– Casandra “Cassie” Ventura– sued him in November 2023. She affirmed for 4 days in the test’s very first week.
The claim was gone for $20 million the following day however she touched off a criminal probe with her accusations of undergoing numerous drug-fueled “freak-offs” in which she declared she was required to carry out sexually for days with male sex employees while Combs seen, recorded and guided the activity.
A female that affirmed under the pseudonym “Jane” additionally affirmed throughout the test that she experienced “resort evenings” comparable to “freak-off” in a partnership with Combs from 2021 till his apprehension.
Agnifilo preserved the prosecution was an unfair strike on a popular and hugely effective Black business owner.
” They took Astroglide and they took child oil, which winds up being the proof in this situation, since his organizations are exceptional. There’s absolutely nothing concerning business to discover. There’s absolutely nothing concerning business to make right into a criminal situation,” he claimed.
Protection customizes the situation for jurors, calling it strike on ‘your room’
Agnifilo attempted to cast the situation for the court as an assault on everybody’s room and the tricks of one’s sex life.
” They enter into the guy’s room. They enter into the guy’s most exclusive life. Where is the criminal offense scene? The criminal offense scene is your exclusive sex life. That’s the criminal offense scene,” he claimed as he stood prior to jurors, that were greatly expressionless as they took periodic notes and viewed the closings.
The legal representative claimed it was not unusual that Combs suched as to movie sex-related occasions with his partners, calling it “type of normal, you understand, self-made pornography” and including that “I do not assume by any kind of stretch of the creativity this is the only guy in America making self-made pornography.”
Still, he claimed, private investigators “take yellow criminal offense scene tape, figuratively, and they cover it around his room. Criminal activity scene– your room, your resort areas, where you select your partners. Criminal activity scenes. A great deal of yellow tape.”
Then, he offered a nod to the 50th wedding anniversary of the flick “Jaws,” reanimating a timeless line from Hollywood background when he claimed: “We require a larger roll of criminal offense scene tape, since that’s simply not mosting likely to suffice.”
Judge concurs protection went as well much stating district attorneys targeted Combs
Just after Agnifilo informed jurors that it “takes a great deal of nerve to acquit,” he tore the federal government’s situation a last time in plain terms, stating the test was “really various” from any kind of various other test.
” I assume that the proof reveals, and you can end, that the federal government targeted Sean Combs,” he claimed, keeping in mind that no one whined to the federal government to initiate a probe, however private investigators rather started their job a day after Cassie submitted her claim.
After the court left the space at the verdict of Agnifilo’s four-hour summation, his declaration concerning targeting attracted an objection from the district attorney, Slavik.
When the court returned, Court Court Arun Subramanian kept in mind the comment Agnifilo had actually made concerning targeting Combs and informed jurors that “the choice of the federal government to explore a specific or the choice of a grand court to prosecute a person is none of your worry.”
In reply, a district attorney informs jurors that Combs is ‘not a god’
Assistant united state Lawyer Maurene Comey obtained the last word with a rebuttal discussion to jurors, informing them: “The offender is not a god.”
She claimed that Combs in his mind “was untouchable.” She kept in mind that a person previous individual aide also explained him as a “god amongst males.”
” For twenty years, the offender escaped his criminal activities. That finishes in this court,” she claimed. “He is an individual. And in this court, he stands equivalent prior to the legislation. Frustrating proof verifies his regret. It is time to hold him answerable. Discover him guilty.”
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All civil liberties booked. This product might not be released, program, revised or rearranged without approval.
